Women navigating pelvic organ prolapse treatment options must decide whether or not to utilize non-surgical or surgical treatment. Women have multiple treatment options. It is imperative women educate themselves about pelvic organ prolapse and all treatment options to better enable themselves to ask their clinicians the right questions, and make informed decisions. Check out the link below for Mesh Questions to Ask Your Clinician.
Use of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery can reduce the risk of additional or repeat surgery down the road. For those who opt for surgical treatment, APOPS recommends seeking a female pelvic medicine reconstructive surgeon (FPMRS) urogynecologist or urologist. These surgeons specialize in women's pelvic health, pivotal for POP procedures just as an oncologist is for breast cancer or neurologist for multiple sclerosis (MS), reducing the risk of complications.
A dialogue should be initiated between patient and surgeon whether or not to utilize mesh for your repair. Research your procedure choices, ask your physician ALL questions you have, discuss your options regarding transvaginal mesh repair (through the vagina), robotic or laproscopic procedures, or abdominal mesh repair. In 2011, the FDA issued a warning relating to concerns about transvaginal mesh procedure complications. Urogynecologists and urologists with an additional 2-3 years of fellowship training are the most logical surgeon choice for these intricate procedures. Additionally, it is a good idea to check the records of your individual physician to make sure you have found the right physician for your specific needs.
We all need to know our options. There are options regarding surgical procedures just as there are options whether or not to utilize surgical procedures at all. Ask all questions you have; a physician who will not take the time to address your concerns with this intricate procedure is not the physician of choice.
Some urogynecologists and urologists do not provide mesh procedures; it is a personal preference the specialists in the field make on a one-on-one basis based on their individual concerns. A significant percentage of urogynecologists and urologists who utilize mesh feel transvaginal mesh procedures are a beneficial option. I am a woman whose surgical procedure was transvaginal mesh placement in February 2008. I have been very happy with the outcome; as a woman who is extremely active, I wanted my POP repair to be a one time event rather than worrying about potential for additional POP surgical intervention down the road.
Women who have concerns related to mesh procedures can request entry to and post questions in the APOPS Forum, a secure Facebook forum accessible only to members and women's pelvic health clinicians. Women with POP navigating treatment options, women post surgery both with mesh and without, women who prefer to utilize non-surgical treatment options, and multiple healthcare professionals share insights with each other in our protected environment.
Small incisions, proper mesh insertion location, preparation of mesh insertion site, use of estrogen cream pre and post-surgery, degree of mesh tension, and a two layer closure are important considerations for a quality mesh procedure, whether a surgeon performs mesh surgery through a transvaginal, robotic, or abdominal incision.
Articles by Sherrie Palm
The video above was recorded in 2015. In February 2018, Sherrie reached the 10 year mark post mesh placement without complications, and continues to feel she made the right choice regarding transvaginal placement of mesh. Every woman should do her own homework and question her surgeon about mesh experience and practice.
As information and studies on long term efficacy of mesh become available, APOPS will post them on this page.
Pro/Con mesh info:
(UK) RCOG Mesh Page
(UK) BAUS Mesh Complication Statement
TGA (Australia) actions after review into urogynaecological surgical mesh implants
IUGA commentary on the European Commission report regarding mesh